Mark's campaign notepad and other stuff

Notes from the writer/LibDem parliamentary candidate for Somerton & Frome

Ashes to Ashes

leave a comment »

On the first anniversary of Bowie's death yesterday, I thought I'd post this piece
I wrote soon afterwards on Facebook; it was longlisted for the Fish Short Memoir 
Prize. As it's gone down quite well, I thought I'd use it to re-launch my blog: 
Ashes to Ashes  

Dead things come in threes. Monday, David Bowie; Thursday Alan Rickman, then on 
the Friday morning… As usual, soon after 8am I put the dog on his lead and opened
the front door; there at the top of the steps to the front gate was a dead cat. 
I knew it was dead the moment I saw it. I put the dog back in the house, found a 
suitable box and put the cat in it, and then the box in the safety of the garage 
while we sorted out what to do next. I’d had David Bowie in my head all that week.
I was pole-axed on hearing of his death, and the whole day passed in a cotton-wool
smudge of Bowie records, memories and introspection. The poor cat put me right 
back there, and made me remember Bowie doing the theme song to Cat People. The 
film may not have been an Oscar contender, but the song was good, written with 
disco legend Giorgio Moroder. Cat People. A movie full of cats and dead people. 
People and dead cats. 
I discovered Bowie when I was fourteen. As a young teenager I could be a bit 
pompous (not for the last time, I hear you say), and had decided pop music was 
something that I should grow out of. I was dismissive of my younger brother’s 
interest, and was attempting to convince myself that now I preferred classical 
music. All that changed the first time I heard that riff pumping out of the 
car radio on the way to school. Der-der-der duh-duh-duh, der-der-der duh-duh-duh. 
The Jean Genie, let yourself go! And I did. 
From that moment on, I was a Bowie Freak. That’s what we called ourselves, not 
Bowie fans. We were freaks, and proud of it. “Are you a Bowie freak?” “Yeah, are 
you?” “Yeah.” That was it. Friends for life. As the comic Bob Mortimer’s been 
saying for a while, if you want to know if it’s worth continuing a conversation 
with someone at a party, just ask them if they like Bowie. If they don’t, walk 
away. I was too young to have seen Ziggy Stardust live, but I set about buying 
the back catalogue (even the re-released ‘Images 1966-67’ with Antony Newley-esque
songs like the excruciating Laughing Gnome) and immersing myself in everything 
Bowie. I tried to look like him too, as far as school rules permitted. We weren’t 
allowed to dye our hair, but I washed it in henna every day, which gave it a vague
red tinge you could just about spot in bright sunlight. I went for the feather cut,
 growing it as long at the back as I could get away with. I tried to make the top 
and front stick up, but I never achieved David’s spiky heights. I wore black 
platform shoes under my voluminous grey flannel flares. I was so skinny I nearly 
blew over in the wind at the best of times; with my four inch heels I was a safety
hazard. We had to wear a white shirt and tie, but my shirts had massive collars 
and my ties were all pinks, purples and oranges, tied in a double knot. 
One school holidays, I bought the single Rebel, Rebel. It was to feature on 
Diamond Dogs, but the album hadn’t come out yet. My brother bought Dark Side of 
the Moon by Pink Floyd at the same time. We shared a bedroom and had one of those 
record players like a Dansette though I don’t think it was a proper one. A big red
case with the amplifier in the bottom; it opened up to reveal the record deck and 
the top divided into two loudspeakers. 
One turntable, two new records – it was war. I was the bigger, older brother so I 
won, and the Rebel riff rang out from the feeble speakers – “You’re not sure if 
you’re a boy or a girl”. 
But I had discovered the person I wanted to be. If not myself, Bowie wasn’t a bad 
option. It came at a handy point in my life. I was starting to fancy girls, but I 
just didn’t have a clue what to do. Okay, that’s from a song by contemporaries The
Sweet, not David Bowie. But as he was for a lot of adolescents growing up 
discovering their sexuality, Bowie was there for me. I got some stick from the 
other boys, but if anything I took pride in doing the peacock strut and being 
noticed. It was all OK, because I was going to be a rock star, and David the 
Starman, waiting in the sky, was watching over me. They even gave me the nickname 
‘Mini Bowie’ for a while; that was just fine. 
Like a lot of Bowie fans, I was devastated when David killed off Ziggy Stardust, 
or as he put it in the song lyrics, when the kids had killed the man and he had to
break up the band. And my desolation turned to horror when Bowie re-emerged as a 
white soul boy in his Young Americans phase. How could he do that? We were the 
freaks, the androgynous glamrockers, white and pale? But it was Bowie. He still 
looked amazing, channelling Hamlet via Major Tom as he sat up in a crane wearing 
an ermine cape and holdinga skull in one hand, the mike in the other. So we bought
the record. And of course we grew to love it, and all night, we were the Young 
Americans, until it was time to be The Thin White Duke. Or the Man Who Fell to 
Earth – he could act, as well! We thought so anyway, although it’s true he didn’t 
have to stretch too far to play the alien. 
Bowie left his bisexual androgyny behind him, but I discovered there was a market 
for effete young men like myself, who were just gay enough. Boys who liked to be 
in a girl’s bedroom while they put their make-up on. I finally got to see my hero 
for real at Earls Court on the Station to Station tour; I’d already seen the 
pictures so I knew how to dress – black trousers and waistcoat, open necked white 
shirt, and a pack of Gitanes stuck in the waistcoat pocket, even though I didn’t 
smoke. I joined a thousand other disciples dressed in a similar way; others 
preferred to keep the spirit of Ziggy alive. We were united in our love though, 
and as the bright white lights and crashing rhythms announced the arrival of the 
Bowie train, we worshipped together at the platform. I’ve never known a rock 
concert of such intensity. Then punk and new wave came along, and it all got a bit
tricky. My take on it is that put simply, there were two main punk tribes. There 
were the ‘Oi’ punks and there were the rainbow punks. The former owed a lot to 
skinhead culture, played thrash music and used to fight a lot. The latter were the
offspring of Bowie; lots of art school students and creative young people with 
more subtlety and originality. I came across some of the pace setters quite early 
on. The so-called Bromley Contingent including Siouxsie of the Banshees used to go
to the disco at the Windsor Safari Park (now Legoland) for the same reason we did -
it was one of the very few discos in the country which played music like Bowie and
Roxy and not the mind-numbing pop of bands like Brotherhood of Man and 
Showaddywaddy. Save all your kisses for me. Or not. 
So I joined the arty punk tribe, and saw all the bands like the Clash and the 
Pistols, but still put on the make-up sometimes for the likes of the Banshees or 
Ultravox!, and kept up with Bowie, now into his Heroes period. The grainy black 
and white Berlin aesthetic became the perfect backdrop for the austerity of 
Thatcher’s Britian. I even started making this sort of music now as well as 
listening to it, in amazing bands like AWOL, 1936 and Disturbance Term. You haven’t
 heard of them? No, neither has anyone else. But strutting the stage singing my own
 songs was the most fun I’ve ever had. The art school punks morphed into the New 
Romantics; one of the first ever clubs was called Bowie Nights at Gossips in Dean 
Street, we’d gone full circle. Steve Strange did Fade to Grey with Visage, David 
Bowie sang Ashes to Ashes and both videos looked the same. Steve Strange was even 
in both of them. The old romantic was just as cred as any of the new ones.  Then 
both Bowie and the new romantics became more mainstream, groups like Spandau Ballet 
and Duran Duran becoming mere pop bands, and David Bowie making Let’s Dance, his 
most commercially successful single and album. I saw him again, performing this and 
some of his greatest hits on the Serious Moonlight Tour, when it landed at Milton 
Keynes. That doesn’t sound promising, but he managed to turn the bowl into a 
suburban Grand Meulnes that balmy July evening; infectious tinkling dance music and 
thousands of gold and silver moon-shaped balloons choking the dusty sunset. We 
ended on a high, me and David, with that concert. After that, I gave up the music 
and got a proper job, and he did Tin Machine. Not heard it? You don’t want to. 
Of course he’s done the odd great song since then – like the Buddha of Suburbia 
and Absolute Beginners, both made for film and TV, and the recent Where Are We Now – 
but there hasn’t been another album to match Hunky Dory or Young Americans. 

Nevertheless, my respect for him kept growing. He may have become mega rich and an 
A list celebrity, but he never ‘sold out’, as us punks used to say. He set his own 
moral standards, he kowtowed to no one. In 1983 he asked live in an interview with 
MTV why they featured hardly any black acts on their burgeoning music channel. Now 
savvy bloggers would say he used his white privilege to do so, but people listened,
And Bowie was a man who turned down not only an OBE but a knighthood. And didn’t 
make a big deal of it. No doubt, we’re in a poorer world without him, ashes to 
ashes. The man who organised his own cremation before anyone could start thinking 
about his funeral. No one else attended, not even his own family. Dust to dust.  
As for the cat, there was no collar, but I took him to the vet, who found a 
microchip. He was a Bengal, named Blue, and his owner lived round the corner. 
You could tell Blue had been a character, a big powerful cat even in his box. I 
left him at the vets, and that was an end to it. 

You wish and wish, and wish again 
You've tried so hard to fly 
You'll never leave your body now 
You've got to wait to die 
Silly Boy Blue, silly Boy Blue   

© David Bowie, Silly Boy Blue, 1967

Written by markblackburn

January 11, 2017 at 4:45 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

St John’s Wood Area Forum Nov 13th

leave a comment »

I was at the local Westminster Council Area Forum earlier in the week – I suspect some of the main issues are common to the whole Borough. Here’s some key points:
I saw a presentation on the Parking Sensor trial – not sure about Labour’s claim it’s a money-grabbing scam – at least not yet. As currently piloted, it would appear to improve efficiency and can be an aid to motorists. However there is a danger that the technology could be abused for enforcement/surveillance purposes in the future, and we need to keep an eye on that.
Yet again developers are trying to slink out of their commitment to social housing. Clearly maximum profits are derived from selling on units at the highest possible prices, but the Council needs to be pressured to monitor this and ensure such contraventions do not occur. The current spotlight is on Lodge Road, where the developers are trying to secure 47 ‘intermediate’ units and no ‘social’ at all.
A key issue locally has been the proposed development of St John’s Wood Barracks – the King’s Troop has now departed, but the site has lain vacant for nearly a year. Looks like the previous developes caught a cold on their £200+ million and sold it on – the new developers are expected to make a new application in due course. Isn’t Groundhog Day about this time of year?
Another local issue which has caused consternation is the redevelopment of Quintin Kynaston school – it seems some of the plans are going ahead despite not all planning conditions having been met. Clearly the Council should be held to account if it’s letting this happen.
Basement development has caused problems here as it has across the borough – there’s a call to have more control over this disruptive and potentially damaging trend. Karen Buck is championing this and running a survey with the St John’s Wood Society.
There’s much concern over cuts to police budgets and numbers. Looks like St John’s Wood police station is closing.
There’s £68,000 left in the Abbey Road ward budget! Anyone got any ideas how this could be spent? Who’s hurting most from the cuts? Can we help them?
Shame two of the six councillors didn’t turn up – these forums only happen three times a year, you’d think they could manage that.
The next forum will be held in the Spring

Written by markblackburn

November 16, 2012 at 3:47 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Janice Turner’s Pensions Motion to Lib Dem Conference

leave a comment »

I haven’t blogged since I stood as a PPC but thought I’d use this space for Janice’s excellent motion, supported by the Social Liberal Forum and with Steve Webb’s approval

Pensions reform in the public and private sectors


Conference notes:


a) the commitments in the Coalition Agreement to “safeguarding key benefits and pensions” and to “simplify rules and regulations relating to pensions to help invigorate occupational pensions encouraging companies to offer high quality pensions to all employees”.


b) there is now a major crisis in private sector occupational pension provision and, while welcoming the introduction of auto-enrolment, NEST and the Coalition proposals for reform of the state pension as important steps forward, acknowledges that these proposals cannot in themselves resolve this major crisis.


Conference reaffirms:

a) the party’s historic commitment to fighting poverty in old age which a century ago  brought our introduction of the Old Age Pension


b) the fundamental Liberal Democrat principle that “none shall be enslaved by poverty”.


Conference notes with concern that:


a) the retreat of private sector employers from providing quality pensions is the result of the failures of previous Labour and Conservative governments.


b) the severe market volatility and its uncontrollable impact on Defined Benefit (DB) pension fund deficits demonstrates that current actuarial funding policies introduced by Labour are not fit for purpose and are needlessly damaging sponsoring employers’ finances and destroying DB pension schemes.


c) DB pension schemes are under further pressure from over-regulation, in particular regulatory demands to pay off longterm theoretical deficits in short term time frames.


d) growing numbers of private sector workers are losing confidence in occupational Defined Contribution (DC) pension schemes which push all risk onto the individual, are too expensive and complicated and provide no guarantee of even a minimum pension.


e) there is too little transparency in the fees and charges of pension industry companies including investment companies and that there is a case to answer regarding the levels and structures of fees and charges.


f) the growing number of pension schemes that have no oversight by representatives of the beneficiaries;


g) The proliferation of a multitude of local government pension schemes with their costly duplication of administration costs, fees and charges, inadequate regulations to ensure member-nominated representatives on all LGPS boards and inadequate provision of training for LGPS representatives.


Conference welcomes

a) the Coalition government’s concessions in November/December 2011 regarding its public sector pension proposals;


b) the announcement dropping ideologically motivated proposals that would have allowed companies winning public sector contracts to lower their bids and increase profits by abolishing the privatised workforce’s “Fair Deal” entitlements;


c) the ‘big pots’ proposals to allow private sector workers to put their pension savings from multiple schemes into one place.



Conference calls upon Liberal Democrats in government to:


1) Act with great urgency to protect private sector DB schemes including

a) immediate reform of pension scheme actuarial valuation rules that make pension scheme costs so volatile for employers,

b) lifting such overly interventionist regulatory practices as automatic investigation of longer deficit repair periods; and

c) opposing European-level legislation that would inadvertently have the effect of closing DB schemes.


2) radically reform and simplify the design of occupational defined contribution pension schemes in order to achieve greater certainty of pension;


3) Legislate to ensure real transparency and accountability to scheme beneficiaries of contract-based schemes and make it a requirement that all trust-based schemes have member-nominated trustees;


4) investigate and act in relation to pensions industry charges, fees, annuity prices, benchmarks, transparency and disclosure, including investment charges and charging structures, in order to ensure that pension schemes and their members achieve better value for money.


5) Save money from the local government pension schemes by merging them into one or more schemes, while ensuring more effective control by member and employer representatives, with the resulting benefits shared with the scheme members.


6) Investigate the extension of the Pensions Regulator’s Online Toolkit, the foundation stone of private sector trustee training, to include training modules for public sector representatives, and introduce an entitlement for all pension scheme trustees and representatives to have specified minimum levels of paid time off for training and preparation.







Explanatory notes:


The proposer has sought the advice of Conference Committee on drafting and all advice has been followed.


This motion has been discussed with Lib Dem Pensions Minister Steve Webb and he supports the motion.


Conference notes with concern b): The 2004 Pensions Act and subsequent 2005 regulations forced pension schemes to carry out their three-yearly valuation using a method based on theories of efficient markets. Schemes have to value their liabilities over a 30 or 40 year timeframe, but the new law forced them to value their assets on the basis of market prices on the day the valuation fell due. So if the markets did really well that day the scheme’s prospects would look good, but if the market did disastrously then the pension scheme could face closure. This has made DB schemes wildly unstable: last July the Pension Protection Fund stated that the combined pension scheme deficits were around £8.3 billion, but six weeks later it was £117.5-billion. Pension funds should plan for the long term but this makes it impossible and nearly 2.5-million people’s pension schemes are at risk of closure. Closures are being announced almost every week.


Conference welcomes

(b): announced by Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander in advance of the 30 November strike.

(c): the “Fair Deal” agreement made some years ago between the government and the public sector unions ensured that public sector workers who were compulsorily transferred out of the public sector as a result of contracting out kept their entitlement to either remain in their existing pension scheme or transfer to a scheme with similar benefits. The government decided to review this policy and one option was to abolish this entitlement completely.



Conference calls upon…

1a) this is not a reference to international accounting standard IAS 19 or FRS 17, it refers to the 2004 Pensions Act and subsequent regulations.


1c) Solvency 2 is one such proposal. A European Commission green paper published last July aimed to launch a public debate on how to ensure adequate, sustainable and safe pensions across the EU. Its proposals include increasing capital requirements and possible pan-European regulation of pension funds. Pensions Minister Steve Webb, who is building an international coalition against it, believes the proposed “Solvency II” rules could burden DB schemes with a £100-billion bill which could trigger massive numbers of scheme closures.


6. There are more than 100 local government pension schemes. Unison commissioned a report from the world’s third-largest public sector pension fund management company which concluded that over £1-billion could be saved by merging them into around 14 schemes. The savings would be by removing duplication, negotiating better fees and obtaining better returns. By comparison, the government’s public sector pensions proposals were requiring £900-million savings. 


In conclusion

Public sector:

In November the Coalition’s controversial proposals on public sector pensions reform led to one of the biggest strikes of recent years. This motion, which welcomes the concessions the government made, will allow this to happen. It also sets out a way of making substantial savings in the LGPS to be shared with the scheme members.


Private sector:

If these proposals are adopted, they will bring back more stability into DB schemes and corporate financial planning and allow these schemes – the best in the private sector – to better ride out market downturns. But in radically reforming and simplifying DC schemes they will improve the retirement prospects of millions of private sector workers who are not in DB schemes. And by investigating and acting on the issue of pensions industry fees and charges, in particular investment fees and fee structures, the Lib Dems will be ensuring better value for money for all private sector pension schemes (and funded public sector schemes). This positive action for private sector workers’ pensions will put our party far ahead of both Labour and the Conservatives on this issue.


This motion is on the long side, on a par with the longest motions at the autumn conference. But most of the issues in this motion have not been debated by conference since 2004 and so much has happened to pensions since then that it has inevitably led to substantial proposals for change.

Written by markblackburn

January 10, 2012 at 4:22 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

2010 in review

leave a comment »

The stats helper monkeys at mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads This blog is on fire!.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

A Boeing 747-400 passenger jet can hold 416 passengers. This blog was viewed about 3,000 times in 2010. That’s about 7 full 747s.

In 2010, there were 57 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 61 posts. There were 14 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 20mb. That’s about a picture per month.

The busiest day of the year was May 5th with 121 views. The most popular post that day was Election Day -3 & -2: Just time for a little story….

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were,,,, and

Some visitors came searching, mostly for mark blackburn, body scans at airports, markblackburn.wordpress, mark blackburn blog, and expressing embarrassment.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.


Election Day -3 & -2: Just time for a little story… May 2010
1 comment


Full Body Scans at Airports? January 2010


Election Day -55: Something is Rotten in the State of Westminster Parking March 2010


Election Day +5: Thank You May 2010


Election Day -12: Sex and Gambling April 2010

Written by markblackburn

January 2, 2011 at 12:13 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

London Assembly Report on Small Shops

leave a comment »

Before the election, I combined my long experience in retail and my short experience in politics by making a submission to the London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee review on the future of independent shops. As a result, I received a copy of the report recently and these are my thoughts on it, which I’ve submitted to the committee as invited.
(You can see the report at )
I welcome the good news that the planning system can be used to protect small shops, but I do feel more must be made to encourage councils and planning authorities both to be aware of this and to act upon it.
I also think it will be an improvement on the status quo to require planning permission for a change of use from A1 to A3, under an amended Use Classes Order. This would stop small retailers of useful goods being turned into yet more cafes without any examination. Incidentally, I was once in the advanced stages of taking over a small retail outlet in a North London suburb when a global coffee shop operator entered the proceedings offering the landlord a £50,000 reverse premium, i.e. a financial inducement to let them take on the lease. You can guess who got the outlet. The result: a local high street with one more coffee house and one less provider of goods. 
At the moment planning regulations do not require that a competition test as recommended by the Competition Commission takes place; I endorse the suggestion that it now do so, as far too many small businesses have gone under the cosh as a result of irresponsible granting of permission to new entrants. Similarly I encourage “106 provision” (where developers are given planning permission only if they also make a financial contribution to public amenities) towards town centre rejuvenation and affordable shop units, though I would query how these could be protected in the long term with rent reviews and lease renewals.
However, I am concerned that much of the report deals with attempting to ameliorate the situation rather than deal with its root cause. I realise that the national structure of property ownership, investment and management is outside the remit of this report, but I do think an opprtunity to address and question this has been lost. Too often because of the need of institutions to see a theortically high and secure income stream and therefore have tenants with a stronger covenant, independents misses out. When an institutional landlord has to decide between a global multiple or a local independent, the independent will always lose out. As is rightly pointed out in the report, the obligations of a 25 year long upward-only rent review lease are often too burdensome for the independent, even assuming they can overcome the hurdles of covenant and rent deposit.
There is a further problem caused by the upward-only aspect of rent reviews – what happens when the type of ill-advised property development referred to above is built, and local shops see their revenues fall? If rents too could fall in line with the market, then maybe they could survive – but rents are kept artificially high and the shops either go bust or become the likes of charity shops.
For the sake of not only our independent stores, but more generally our high streets and established shopping centres, I encourage action on the  progressive ideas in this report and ask for real engagement with central government planning policy.

Written by markblackburn

December 10, 2010 at 3:39 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

What’s Philip Green got to do with Tuition Fees?

with 3 comments

The obvious answer is that there are two lots of protesters out on our streets, the UK Uncut bunch who are protesting over tax avoidance and the students with regard to tuition fee increases. But it goes beyond that; both are totemic of higher than ever levels of discontent with our political machine, and we are in part responsible for that because, having promised the electorate and especially young people that we were the “new politics”, we have broken our pledges and promises and shown that actually there is little to distinguish us from our predecessors.

I was proud to stand as a Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Candidate in May and among the many commitments I gave as PPC was a promise to the NUS that I would support their funding pledge. I felt secure in doing so; I’m a so-called “social Liberal” anyway and was brought up on Beveridge and Keynes, but more importantly in this instance I’d received a personalised message from Nick Clegg telling me that we’d developed a plan to phase out tuition fees over the next six years, which would ensure this vital policy would be affordable even in this time of recession. Additionally I received an email from party HQ saying that the pledge was consistent with party policy and I was free to sign it. So I did, along with about 500 others.

I appreciate we’re in a Coalition and compromises have to be made. And I appreciate that tuition fees have to be funded somehow. But that’s not the point. The point is what we said to get elected. On the basis of the pledge and our policy, I replied to emails from students telling them I backed the pledge, and some of our election literature made reference to our support of it. I’ve finally got round to putting all my old cuttings away, and a headline in Liberal Democrat News caught my eye. “The Fight to End ‘Old Politics'”, all about our radical plans and our difference to the two main parties. And that’s where Philip Green comes into it – one of the first actions the Coalition took was to appoint an alleged tax avoider to advise us on potential civil service savings – a poor decision which sent out all the wrong signals and which we should never have allowed to take place. Tax evasion, broken promises, bankers off the hook – it’s too much the “same as it ever was”, no wonder people are disappointed and angry. Meanwhile, just how many students could have been funded by the unpaid tax on the £1.2 billion Arcadia 2005 dividend?

Nick Clegg tells us that it’s time to grow up and take on the responsibilities that go with belonging to the party in power. But the irony is that the million extra votes which put us in that position were given because of the pledges and promises we made to the electorate, and in particular young people. Our MPs need to remember that tomorrow.

Written by markblackburn

December 8, 2010 at 4:15 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

City of Westminster Planning Committee: Quintin Kynaston School

leave a comment »

(nb this is my own view of last night’s events, no more, no less)

Last night Westminster’s planning committee met to discuss among other matters two applications relating to QK School. First there was an outline application relating to the redevelopment of the main secondary school (QK) and then a detailed application relating to George Elliot, the infant and junior school (GE) and the Alternative Provision Centre (APC).

The outline application for QK was merely a report on progress, and was duly noted, but the GE and APC application was a detailed submission, where planning permission was being requested. The application quickly ran into trouble, the main issue seeming to be the difficulty of dealing with the applications for different parts of the site as separate unrelated entities. There are so many issues relating to GE and the APC that have to be dealt with in conjunction with QK, and indeed the Chair (Cllr Alastair Moss) stated that a “more holistic approach” was needed in dealing with the planning process for what is a major educational facility.

Although not on the planning committee, Abbey Road Councillor Lindsey Hall spoke on behalf of the residents and I must say she made a very powerful case for the holistic approach generally and for careful further examination of the GE/APC part and its impact on the local community.

There are particular issues with both pedestrian and motor traffic, parking, floodlighting in a residential area and the Environmental Impact Survey, especially with regard to the loss of green space.

Indeed, it was interesting to me how important the loss of trees is becoming in the planning process. As Cllr Robert Rigby said, every application which goes before the committee seems to involve cutting down trees, and he implied that this could not be allowed to go on unabated. Indeed there was a suspicion that the developers had pulled a fast one in that an aerial photograph of the area in question produced by a local residents group showed a greener space than that in the drawn illustration by the applicants. The Chair feared the possibility of “a landgrab of the most sensitive part of the site”.

The APC deserves particular comment – on top of general concerns about such a facility being sited in the middle of a residential area Cllr Hall declared that we are “on the verge of merging education services with Hammersmith & Fulham and Kensington & Chelsea” (not sure how these Supercouncil ideas fit in with the Big Society/localism justification for listening to residents’ concerns) could mean that excluded pupils from all three boroughs end up here.

In short, the Chair felt the committee was “incapable of making a decision at the moment” and the application was not approved, with an acknowledgement that a full site visit needed to be convened asap (slightly surprising this hadn’t already taken place?!) and the application urgently re-submitted – there was a suggestion that a central funding window was imminently closing, if it hasn’t already.

The residents were delighted, the applicants naturally less so – round two mooted for January 2011.

Written by markblackburn

December 3, 2010 at 11:22 am

Posted in Uncategorized